Skip to content

Telco 214.

A Bitcoin miner that found blocks from December 2014 to August 2017 and never said publicly who ran it.

About Telco 214

Telco 214 is the name block explorers give to a miner that found 1,830 Bitcoin blocks between 19 December 2014 and 23 August 2017. In 2015, its busiest year, it found about one block in fifty. Its blocks carried no name, so explorers recognise them by the addresses their rewards were paid to, which the developer James Hilliard first listed under that name in May 2015.

Nobody has said publicly who ran it. Explorers link it to telco214.com, a company website that never mentioned Bitcoin.

Each block paid its reward to one address, or from late 2016 almost all of it to one address and a little to a second. That reward is separate from the transactions confirmed inside the block. Its last nine blocks, in August 2017, carried the tag “NYA”, for the New York Agreement, a plan backed by most miners that summer to change Bitcoin’s rules. It found no blocks after 23 August 2017, and no announcement about why has been found.

Background reviewed . Read the sources.

When it mined

First block19 Dec 2014Attributed to this pool
Last block23 Aug 2017No blocks since
Blocks found1,830All time

Share of all mining over time

Weekly estimates
22 Dec 201428 Aug 2017

Peak 3.0%, in the week of 26 Jan 2015

Every week the pool found blocks, as its share of all Bitcoin mining. Estimates come from observed blocks, rather than a direct reading of the pool’s machines.

Last blocks

Select a block to see its transactions

What this means for your payment

When a block containing your payment joins the Bitcoin blockchain, your payment gets its first confirmation. Later blocks add confirmations, whichever pool finds them. The pool name does not identify the sender or recipient of your payment.

Sources and how to read the data

Background comes from the sources below. Activity comes from the mempool-compatible API used by UTXOHub. Pool names are attributed using block tags and known reward addresses; they are not proof of an individual miner’s identity and may be incomplete or incorrect.